Sun Fire X4140

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSun Fire X4140  (all builds)
MotherboardSun Sun Fire X4140
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 18 '17 at 17:33
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2356
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 34
2-Core 68.2
38% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 271
24% 204 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 587GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 256GB
202GB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 84%
TinyDisk 2005.09.19 1GB
1GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.7% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 13.2
Mixed 5.03
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.63
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.15
24% 1.32 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback