Compaq PS266AA-ABU SR1340UK GB510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq PS266AA-ABU SR1340UK GB510 (all builds)
Motherboard	AHI
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050131
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 12:45
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 52 1-Core 27.2 2-Core 25 26% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 23.2 8-Core 27.1 3% 25.2 Pts	64-Core 26.8 2% 26.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series Asus(1043 032A) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.27 0% 0.25 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 130GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 190 0 (03) Spinup time 122 117 4425 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8476 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 5 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10673 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7670 (C2) HDA temperature 105 89 45 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 5 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	21.2% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 30.5 26% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.39 104% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 32%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 63 50 121756817 (03) Spinup time 98 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9328 (05) Reallocated sector count 73 73 1094 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 162372452 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 42329 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9420 (C2) HDA temperature 41 45 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 50 121756817 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 250 3	22.3% Poor	Read 53.3 Write 24.5 Mixed 19.4 24% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.17 42% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.4% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Compaq PS266AA-ABU SR1340UK GB510

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)