Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory212GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 212GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory208 GB free of 212 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 221
33% 238 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 95 98 95 98 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 104
Write 96.9
Mixed 103
SusWrite 91
22% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 22.9
78% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 194
120% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-... 212GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
197% Outstanding
MC Read 72.8
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 103
220% 77.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 55.2
SC Mixed 44.2
118% 41.4 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 4 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback