Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 18.7 1-Core 3.3 2-Core 10.2 8% 10.7 Pts	4-Core 8.7 8-Core 10.4 1% 9.55 Pts	64-Core 8.7 0% 8.7 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 25 31 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 8.7 Write 13.3 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 25.3 11% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 43%
Single Flash Reader 4GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 6335 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.6 6 6 5.6 5.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 4.5 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 5.8 10% 8.85 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.3 68% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.73% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 330 12% 330 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM