Acer Veriton M200-A78

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-A78  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M200-A55
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 07:43
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 120
54% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 107 103 106 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 99
Write 105
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 104
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback