Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory75GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 75GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory44.2 GB free of 75 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime11 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core
CPU 0, 6 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 45.1
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 124
47% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 500
44% 373 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 91GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 92 93 90 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 82%
Vmware Virtual disk 161GB
148GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 81 87 89 87 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 103%
Vmware Virtual disk 483GB
181GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 95 93 92 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 73%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
47GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 67 63 63 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB 75GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
138% Outstanding
MC Read 59
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 66.3
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback