Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C2ACAZXLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-C2ACAZXLM  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2-1
Memory4.6 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 04:32
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 127
56% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKP1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 214 169 104 105 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 240
Write 194
Mixed 203
SusWrite 151
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 156
130% 188 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 12.5" 1280 720 MS_9003 1366x768
Typical CF-C2ACAZXLM Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2ACAZXLM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback