Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge T320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge T320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T320  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 10:40
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1410 0
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 135
58% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 339
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 32.8
0% 20.4 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 20
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VQN6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 189 195 182 182 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.5% Above average
Read 242
Write 194
Mixed 171
SusWrite 187
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 26.3
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 125
109% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 82%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$27
83GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 205 218 223 225 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 234
Write 216
Mixed 184
SusWrite 216
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 12.5
66% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 81.2
87% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0-YH9 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 10% 42 190 127 60 21.5" 1920 1080 LEN65C5 LEN LI2264d
Typical PowerEdge T320 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback