Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

Performance Results


Gaming 177% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 239% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE (all builds)
Memory	240 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration	458 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100 4,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 71.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 280 87% 164 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 1,046 95% 800 Pts	64-Core 3,249 201% 3,249 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$785 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87AF); asus rtx 3090 strix gaming OC CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	203% Outstanding	Lighting 300 Reflection 270 Parallax 295 244% 288 fps	MRender 327 Gravity 249 Splatting 182 199% 252 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 304% 662GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1527 1557 1494 1472 1264 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,218 Write 1,664 Mixed 1,032 SusWrite 1,468 305% 1,346 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 55.4 186% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 791 DQ Write 586 DQ Mixed 649 496% 676 MB/s
Poor: 227% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 365%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 930GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 345 350 348 341 301 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 361 Write 422 Mixed 277 SusWrite 339 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 32.9 118% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 130 123% 184 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 104%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 466GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 346 351 349 342 301 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 405 Write 410 Mixed 309 SusWrite 340 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 33.8 122% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 157 142% 210 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 105%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 770GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 1601 1582 1581 1642 1662 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 2,046 Write 1,932 Mixed 1,419 SusWrite 1,614 394% 1,753 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 61.2 212% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 835 DQ Write 615 DQ Mixed 691 526% 714 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2142 2145 2153 1883 1110 1120 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 2,112 Write 2198 Mixed 1,503 SusWrite 1,759 426% 1,893 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 56.4 194% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 843 DQ Write 611 DQ Mixed 687 524% 714 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 371%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 11TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 219 216 206 187 208 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 11TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 242 240 240 232 246 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3600C18 8x31.9GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 8 of 8 slots used 255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 64 MC Mixed 47.8 147% 51.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 10.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 196%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 8R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	33%	36	238	135	240	48.7"	5120 1440	SAM7053 LC49G95T

History: Score 19: 1R 3G 5B | Score 56: 7R 5G 6B | Score 52: 8R 4G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 176%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 222%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	161x
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	55x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	44x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $785Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	89x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	64x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	30x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	55x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	30x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	27x

RAM
CMW64GX4M8X3600C18 4x8GBCorsairBench 118%, 76 samples	8x
F4-3200C16-32GVK 8x31.9GBG.SKILLBench 153%, 139 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 4266 C19 4x8GBKingstonBench 110%, 199 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16