QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory16.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D1508
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 48.5
26% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 106
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology iSCSI Storage 69GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 84 116 128 111 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 170
Write 271
Mixed 228
SusWrite 127
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 5.6
22% 6.83 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 51.8
43% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 4.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 0 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback