QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 732 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 12:34
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Atom (SnowRidge)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
Memory 30.9
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 76
27% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 78.6
8-Core 79.6
11% 79.1 Pts
64-Core 77.3
5% 77.3 Pts
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 2.4 1.7 2.2 23 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 362
Write 231
Mixed 324
SusWrite 34.5
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 5
18% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 64 0" 1280 713
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback