Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 213
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 312
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 13.8
10% 11.6 fps
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.1
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KUS040202M-B000 512GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY8AM1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 170 56 49 43 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 579
Write 359
Mixed 258
SusWrite 128
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 38.1
136% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 121
134% 240 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 170%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB
466GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 31.6
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 31.5
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 33%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
132GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.6 4.6 4.2 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.07% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 32
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 4.8
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 21.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 11% 9 60 4 60 12.3" 1368 912 LGD0555
Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback