Lenovo 4353B64

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4353B64  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 02:07
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 172
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 606
56% 467 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 19.2
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.6
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9240-8i 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 56 43 41 40 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 370
Write 218
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 53.5
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 16.5
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 20.6
20% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 45%
LSI MR9240-8i 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 40%
Lacie P9233 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 126 124 124 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.9 7 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 24.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 7.1
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
200% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 53%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.1 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 24.1
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 7.3
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 7
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.3
145% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
171GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 24.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 7.2
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 44%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 23.6
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 7.1
27% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 6.9 7 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 23.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 6.9
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
183% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 53%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
931GB free, PID 5033
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 28.6
Write 28.7
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 13.4
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 30%
HP External HDD 499GB
465GB free, PID 4507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 13.1
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
WD My Passport 2TB
1TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 21.1
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 4
18% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 32.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 32" 1280 720 GDH0030 Smart TV
Typical 4353B64 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4353B64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback