To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140512
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 19:04
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 41 2-Core 78.8 42% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 82.7 8-Core 78.3 11% 80.5 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 3181) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 7.1 6% 6.97 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 5.9 5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 34 76 56 23 26 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31% Below average	Read 176 Write 111 Mixed 121 SusWrite 47.3 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 15.9 66% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 30.5 DQ Mixed 21.3 17% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 86%
ADATA HD710M PRO 2TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 521GB free, PID a81a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 18 22 23 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 23.6 Mixed 10.6 SusWrite 21.4 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 22: 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
22%	10%	105	46	29	60	23.8"	1920 1080	BNQ78E4 BenQ GW2470

History: Score 10: 0R 3G 1B | Score 22: 2R 2G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	717x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	266x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	304x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16