Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 665
71% 567 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 187 131 234 165 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,062
Write 1,146
Mixed 932
SusWrite 194
239% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 83.9
268% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 645
534% 765 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 215%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 7 4 60 23" 1920 1080 DELD058 DELL S2340L
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $481
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback