Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 05:04
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 81.2
48% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 122
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 20.9
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 16.8
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 169 169 170 130 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 419
Write 413
Mixed 391
SusWrite 179
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 31.4
111% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 240
168% 211 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MD03ACA200V 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: FL2V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 162 161 160 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 159
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 4GBBNAUCDBA 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELF03B DELL IN1930
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback