Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	58 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 74 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 128 54% 89 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 332 34% 275 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 2008) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.6 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB 4,965 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 931GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 169 173 173 173 175 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.8% Poor	Read 8.2 Write 7.7 Mixed 8 SusWrite 173 11% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 6.7 36% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 27.5 53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 100%
P3-1TB 1TB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 954GB free Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 239 232 229 30 233 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.9% Good	Read 250 Write 238 Mixed 235 SusWrite 199 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 32.8 104% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 176 133% 179 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 105%
NE-128 128GB 3,172 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7A0L Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 870 Write 392 Mixed 312 114% 524 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 3.5 56% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 185 116% 134 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 173%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 13TB free Firmware: JU00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 141 142 142 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 141 Write 135 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 140 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.6 236% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 79%
Jmicron Tech 2TB 299 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 36GB free Firmware: 8136 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.6 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 28.6 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 9.5 19% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 108%
Jmicron Tech 2TB 299 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 36GB free Firmware: 8136 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 28.9 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 9.4 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 108%
ACASIS INIC-3610 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free, PID 3a40 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.6% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 24.9 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 16.1 33% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1 4x16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.8 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17"	1280 720	GSM4434 L1752T

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	104x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	62x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	26x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	13x
SSD 256GBTammuzBench 95%, 266 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	18x
36KSF2G72PZ-1 1x16GBMicronBench 28%, 138 samples	16x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16