Supermicro SYS-2028U-TRT+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro SYS-2028U-TRT+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRU-i+
Memory246.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170421
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 11 '17 at 02:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 607
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M10
Nvidia(10DE 1160) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 370.12
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 19
16% 18.1 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 16.2
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 552
Mixed 726
175% 793 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 19.8
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 105
107% 175 MB/s
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 682
Write 318
Mixed 416
104% 472 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 18.3
59% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 77.7
92% 164 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC 16x16GB
16 of 24 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 33.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback