Asus <P4B>

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20020821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '17 at 15:59
Run Duration	1059 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz 212 User benchmarks, average bench 23% PGA 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 20 2-Core 20.2 32% 38.8 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 23.6 3% 23.5 Pts	64-Core 24.4 2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor 6L300R0 300GB-$46 322 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: BAJ41G20 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 188 185 18849 (04) Start/Stop count 253 253 70 (05) Reallocated sector count 229 229 249 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 250 247 60865 (09) Power-on hours count 253 253 9547 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 253 253 193 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 253 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 2179 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 83 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 240 240 157 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	17.1% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 30.6 Mixed 29 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.15 32% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 34%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.74 Mixed 5.68 9% 9.03 MB/s	4K Read 1.45 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.16 18% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x0.33GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 3 of 5 slots used 1GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.58% Terrible	MC Read 0.9 MC Write 1 MC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.87 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 17%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16