QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	8.06% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	8.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K 60 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 146 2-Core 250 93% 163 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 547 74% 551 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 97.1 Parallax 88.8 82% 95.6 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 76.7 72% 89 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 77 84 87 95 91 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.06% Terrible	Read 58 Write 40.6 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 80.6 12% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 3% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 81%
Qemu HARDDISK 431GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 138GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 116 118 121 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 118 Mixed 81.6 SusWrite 116 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x10GB 540 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 10GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 29.1 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 30.9 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0795 SA300/SA350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16