Today's hottest deals

Avita NS14A6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAvita NS14A6  (all builds)
MotherboardAVITA 6Q14DA9M83
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 10:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19% Very poor
Memory 29.3
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 24.4
18% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 53.3
7% 52.7 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Device(1DC2 2208) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.30.28
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 198 248 198 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 298
Write 270
Mixed 322
SusWrite 206
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 9.2
29% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 114
91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 3 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.8
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0868
Typical NS14A6 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Avita NS14A6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback