HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1850
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130816
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '21 at 00:30
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6500B APU 1,094 User benchmarks, average bench 52% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 110 45% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 144 22% 157 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D 8,328 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 1850) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	4.1% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 4.6 4% 5.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 5.7 4% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 461GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 127 129 130 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 82.1 Write 138 Mixed 99.4 SusWrite 128 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 13GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 15.6 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4 13% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 21GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 80.5 53% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Mixed 0 38% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
K H 2x4GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.8 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	18.5"	1280 720	HWP3005 HP LV1911

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

CPU
A8-5500B APUAMDBench 48%, 2,596 samples	159x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	145x
A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)AMDBench 52%, 1,191 samples	60x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	134x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	113x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	42x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBHBench 28%, 136 samples	20x
1x4GBHBench 22%, 243 samples	18x
M 1x4GBSBench 21%, 245 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16