Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer PI411
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210601
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 12,809 User benchmarks, average bench 78% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 42.1 1-Core 62.1 2-Core 116 41% 73.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 367 34% 281 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU) 140,621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Device(1A58 2014) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.60 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.86% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 61.8 Parallax 13.6 8% 28.4 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 10.8 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB 9,396 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 864GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 1062 1037 1047 1112 1109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,236 Write 1,128 Mixed 1,096 SusWrite 1,054 254% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 61.2 197% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 517 DQ Write 375 DQ Mixed 466 343% 453 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB 20,634 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 24.3 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 24.7 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	14"	1280 720	SHP1523 LQ140M1JW49

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900HXAMDBench 78%, 12,809 samples	456x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	189x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	169x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	65x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	281x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	111x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	18x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	294x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16