Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 869
75% 641 Pts
64-Core 2,220
137% 2,220 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
45GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,237
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,320
398% 1,795 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 80.4
241% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 951
672% 862 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 151 154 147 146 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 147
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF4G72PDZ-3G2B2 1x31GB
1 of 12 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 32 0" 1280 720
Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback