Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 50.1 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 131 43% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 497 43% 367 Pts	64-Core 1,272 79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.85 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 15.8 11% 16.1 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB 5,144 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 398 281 103 101 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 304 Write 104 Mixed 112 SusWrite 253 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 20.8 71% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 64.5 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 135 86% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 107%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 8GB free Firmware: 2E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 35 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 51 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 35.7 32% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 100GB free Firmware: 1H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 81.6 Write 85.2 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 78.7 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 69%
WD WD400BD-22JMC0 40GB 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 36GB free Firmware: 1C06 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 55.2 39% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-CK0 16x8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 36 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 30 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	32"	1280 720	MTC0B01 MTC26T42

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16