Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N68-AM SE2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M2N68-AM SE2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090311
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 09:47
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X2 240
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 81.9
45% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 82.6
8-Core 82
11% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 19 28 36 36 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 36
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 29.9
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 1% 71 32 21 60 84.6" 1536 864 VES3700 49UHD_LCD_TV
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 18: 2R 2G 2B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical M2N68-AM SE2 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68-AM SE2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback