Today's hottest deals

HP Beats 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Beats 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22A8
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5545M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 34.6
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 54.2
24% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 83.8
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 90.1
6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8510G
HP(103C 22A8) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 59 66 50 47 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40% Average
Read 78.2
Write 67.1
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 61.3
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.78% Terrible
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 11% 55 27 17 60 15.5" 1366 768 CMN15BC
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 10: 0R 3G 1B | Score 14: 1R 2G 3B
Typical Beats 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Beats 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback