Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G465
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G465 @ 1.90GHz, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 55.5
38% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 42
6% 41.9 Pts
64-Core 44.2
3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 56 19 16 41 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 20.9
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 46.2
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MK1665GSX 160GB
109GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 15.2
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 14
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 4
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 3.4
10% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.9
110% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 1.8
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 701 GSM56FE W2243
Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback