Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130225
Uptime	15.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G465 286 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G465 @ 1.90GHz, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 55.5 38% 53.4 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 42 6% 41.9 Pts	64-Core 44.2 3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 56 19 16 41 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 71.4 Write 20.9 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 46.2 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MK1665GSX 160GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 109GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 15.2 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 14 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 4 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 3.4 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.9 110% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 1.8 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	21.5"	1280 701	GSM56FE W2243

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	254x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	227x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	215x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	454x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	211x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	89x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	48x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363