Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 03:14
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 198 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 378 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM02D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 187 188 185 184 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 290 Write 186 Mixed 172 SusWrite 185 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 17.8 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 21.8 20% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 73%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 82GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 29 43 46 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 44.2 Write 45 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 42.5 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 29%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 24GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 20 9.7 19 16 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 135 Write 52.7 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 23.3 84% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.2 218% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9P5471-012.A00LF 1x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	18.7"	1280 720	HWP290B Compaq S1922

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	189x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16