Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 8951G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 8951G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SM81_HR
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 20:09
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 136
61% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 346
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0566) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2345
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.4
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9750423AS 750GB-$65
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 14 18 35 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 11.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 22.4
16% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8951G Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8951G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback