Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 388 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 18.7 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BiCS 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0703A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 147 39 42 44 44 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 296 Write 197 Mixed 214 SusWrite 85.4 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 14.6 116% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 76.7 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 27.4 52% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.4% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 19.4 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 21 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	565x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	478x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	147x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	89x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16