Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 209% UFO	Desktop 110% UFO	Workstation 232% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210521
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '21 at 17:44
Run Duration	335 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$250 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 167 2-Core 331 107% 198 Pts	4-Core 646 8-Core 1243 112% 945 Pts	64-Core 2,290 142% 2,290 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB; ROG-STRIX-RTX3080-O10G-GAMING CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Lighting 289 Reflection 254 Parallax 288 236% 277 fps	MRender 317 Gravity 240 Splatting 175 192% 244 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 347GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 972 888 857 845 844 848 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2737 Write 2,621 Mixed 1,897 SusWrite 876 454% 2,033 MB/s	4K Read 72 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 100 340% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 1388 DQ Write 1,182 DQ Mixed 1,274 958% 1,281 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 355%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB 1,705 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 9TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 230 221 231 226 226 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 239 Write 205 Mixed 95.4 SusWrite 227 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 1.6 69% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 4.8 DQ Write 8.5 DQ Mixed 1.2 2% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 45%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 69 64 68 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 102 Write 72.5 Mixed 10.6 SusWrite 66.3 45% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 124 135 124 135 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 121 Write 106 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 129 68% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 92%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 166 172 166 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 149 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 172 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.3 314% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 110 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 110 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 145 145 145 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 152 Write 137 Mixed 94.6 SusWrite 144 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 65.4 MC Write 46.8 MC Mixed 48 153% 53.4 GB/s	SC Read 33.1 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 45.3 101% 35.3 GB/s	Latency 57.1 70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 2R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	18%	45	349	287	120	72.3"	1280 720	GSMC0A0 LG TV

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 20: 2R 2G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,163x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $785Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	480x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	312x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,817

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16