bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2224
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 41.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 154
53% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 302
43% 315 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 136GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 58 65 71 54 112 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 234
Write 134
Mixed 105
SusWrite 67
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 5.3
18% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.1
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 16.2
35% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 4224 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 5 32 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback