Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120104
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 123
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 166
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Legend(17AA 3981) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7619
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 2.6
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 83 14 32 4 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 22.6
Mixed 206
SusWrite 33.7
20% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 12.5
51% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 121
93% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22
48GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 61 61 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 59.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 57.9
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 29 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 28
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback