To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory37.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 06:46
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 115
49% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 553
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 1408
87% 1408 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA 2463) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 35.3
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 26.4
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 256GB 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,196
Write 1,031
Mixed 907
232% 1,045 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 22.4
103% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 364
270% 357 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 161%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
5GB free
Firmware: UF220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 343
Mixed 280
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 9.7
41% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 33.2
46% 84 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 80GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 17.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 21.6
14% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 25%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 160GB
9GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 42 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 42.8
Write 44.4
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 41.7
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B2G70BM0- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 26 7 5 75 19.7" 1920 1080 TXD0000 Display
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback