Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2525 x 1314 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210402
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4850HQ
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 176
54% 101 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 186
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.5.0.49183
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 13
Parallax 13.2
6% 11 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 10
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
152GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 24 0 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2,801
Write 2,165
Mixed 2,196
SusWrite 116
405% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 59.3
204% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 303
216% 275 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 194%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 34.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 11 2 60 0" 2525 1314 PRL5000 Parallels Vu
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback