PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C89 |
Motherboard | MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200820 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '21 at 09:56 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 290 284 281 278 276 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
326GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 172 172 175 170 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM3200HLB-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
61.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 5 | 144 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | VSC0437 VX2458-mhd |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,173x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 779x |
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 331x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 310x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 236x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 230x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $281 |