Notebook X170KM-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook X170KM-G  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook X170KM-G
Memory32.4 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$255
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 190
2-Core 359
112% 212 Pts
4-Core 760
8-Core 1,342
127% 1,051 Pts
64-Core 1,700
105% 1,700 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 7715) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 183
Parallax 165
143% 175 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 132
Splatting 121
119% 149 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO PLUS 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 923 819 817 816 821 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,775
SusWrite 1,046
418% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 92.6
311% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,324
997% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 320%
Great: 365%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2252 2256 2251 1933 1531 1555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 2,481
Write 2,241
Mixed 1906
SusWrite 1963
483% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 88.6
302% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,487
DQ Write 1,299
DQ Mixed 1,381
1,038% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 222%
This bench: 374%
Great: 374%
Nvme Samsung SSD 960 EVO 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1219 1207 1198 1205 993 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,947
Write 1,559
Mixed 983
SusWrite 1,198
318% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 67.8
242% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 1,330
DQ Mixed 1,044
877% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 287%
Great: 287%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$137
25GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,657
Write 2,443
Mixed 1,880
518% 2,326 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 108
375% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,782
DQ Write 1,601
DQ Mixed 1,685
1,266% 1,690 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 40GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 20.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 20% 15 68 6 60 17.2" 1536 864 AUO309B
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B
Typical X170KM-G Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

System: Notebook X170KM-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $365
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback