Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 13.2 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 85.4 24% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 171 23% 169 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E8B 0101) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 0.1 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teelkoou 128G 128GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 74 41 49 41 39 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 204 Write 181 Mixed 186 SusWrite 65.4 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 10.7 46% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 35.5 54% 100 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 375 11% 375 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	28x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	29x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x

SSD
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GBBench 59%, 101 samples	3x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	3x
ShanDianZhe-128G 128GBBench 48%, 38 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16