Asus X705UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X705UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705UAR
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 580 61% 490 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D70) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 8.2 0% 4.37 fps	MRender 7.4 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 11.2 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB 7,802 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 88 96 99 93 92 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 430 Write 332 Mixed 284 SusWrite 105 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 32.2 81% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 225 188% 273 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 87%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 124 127 128 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 128 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 71%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 30GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	8.51% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 14.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 19.2 20% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.51% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 11.4 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705UAR Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	47x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	26x
Pentium 4417UIntelBench 48%, 2,782 samples	26x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	83x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	26x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	24x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	15x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	32x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16