Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 48.3 2-Core 104 38% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 95 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 95.9 6% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3FB4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.2 2% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GB 4,825 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11020C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 275 297 300 306 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 517 Mixed 500 SusWrite 325 105% 466 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 46.7 154% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 220 167% 225 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 176%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x4GB 4,437 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	315x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	63x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	319x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	63x

SSD
CL1-4D128 128GBSsstcBench 83%, 486 samples	67x
TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GBKbg40zmt128gBench 107%, 1,367 samples	38x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	34x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16