TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GP62 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 17:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 362
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
MSI(1462 115A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 16.9
14% 16.3 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 13.2
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 14.1%
 Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2120G 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 189 189 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 502
Write 188
Mixed 228
SusWrite 188
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 37.7
150% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 131
131% 212 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 88.5%
 Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
561GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 96.1
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 94.3
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 53.6%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0215 CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples1,173x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples328x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples88x
GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples948x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples507x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples91x
SSD
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples155x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend  $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples56x
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GBBench 79%, 2,005 samples32x
RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples285x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples237x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples173x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback