Today's hottest deals

Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 305E4A/305E4A
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3420M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 34.5
21% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 88.7
8-Core 67.3
11% 78 Pts
64-Core 78.7
5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Sanyo(144D C625) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.6
0% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bory R500 240G 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 137 195 194 147 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 198
Write 155
Mixed 167
SusWrite 116
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 11.4
40% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 75.2
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 0.5
30% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305E4A/305E5A/305E7A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback