Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 21:15
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-8265U
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 150
51% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 302
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 172GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 136 134 127 121 134 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.8% Below average
Read 275
Write 243
Mixed 233
SusWrite 130
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 13.6
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.5
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 47.7
37% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 80%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 86GB
33GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 133 128 120 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 299
Write 263
Mixed 297
SusWrite 130
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 14.1
47% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 48.4
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 54.9
41% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 15.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 0.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback