DELL Studio XPS 435T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 06:18
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 119
60% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 299
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.0.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 14.2
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ARRAY0 1TB
704GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 40 112 52 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 44.6
Write 53.9
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 55
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback