Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G5600-$67 766 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 77 1-Core 108 2-Core 176 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 307 37% 287 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 9.5 9% 11.3 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 12.5 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis LENSE40256GMSP34MESTB3A 256GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.3.7182 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,067 Write 923 Mixed 752 203% 914 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 53.3 159% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 630 DQ Write 406 DQ Mixed 270 268% 435 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 185%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston LV26D4U9S8HJ-8 2x8GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 24.1 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 21.3 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Gold G5600Intel $67Bench 70%, 766 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	2x

SSD
LENSE40256GMSP34MESTB3A 256GBUmisBench 127%, 326 samples	1x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 182%, 10,890 samples	1x

RAM
LV26D4U9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 61 samples	1x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	1x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $67

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16