PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus G10AC (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK G10AC |
Memory | 18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131206 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '21 at 22:32 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Asus(1043 8477) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 132 114 112 110 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
131GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 19 18 32 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 215 221 218 227 222 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
628GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 15 17 17 MB/s
|
||||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1TB
1TB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.3 3 5.8 6 4.7 MB/s
|
4.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 537GB
399GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 3.3 5.9 6 5.5 MB/s
|
4.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 212x |
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples | 93x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples | 61x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 35x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $75 |