Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 5630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 5630  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Homa
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 09:08
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Memory 30.1
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 41.8
19% 30.4 Pts
4-Core 36
8-Core 47.6
5% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 43
3% 43 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 013C)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 41 43 16 28 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 31.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 29
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.62% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.8 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 5630 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 5630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback