Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 22 2-Core 41.1 31% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 66.2 8-Core 110 11% 88.3 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.2 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03160102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 153 176 132 68 67 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 207 Write 193 Mixed 176 SusWrite 127 40% 176 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 15.7 54% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 115 86% 115 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 802C 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 16GB 1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.2% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 13 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16