Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 12:05
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 72
2-Core 120
52% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 229
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 159
Parallax 97.7
78% 117 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 94.2
78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 210 234 225 190 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 318
Write 308
Mixed 273
SusWrite 199
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 20
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 234
178% 243 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 124%
OCZ REVODRIVE350 240GB
99GB free
Firmware: 2.50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 210 225 219 193 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 344
Write 245
Mixed 250
SusWrite 199
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 18.1
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 267
201% 272 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 105%
Toshiba MG04ACA600E 6TB
611GB free
Firmware: FS1K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 159 158 155 161 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 175
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 155
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 118%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
503GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 142 145 145 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 156
Write 141
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 134
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MG06ACA800E 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 115 121 120 111 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 111
26% 37.1 MB/s
4K Write 0.2
11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 132%
Toshiba MG06ACA800E 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 117 122 121 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 112
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 132%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
747GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 131 137 138 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 107
Write 112
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 127
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback